ERP Market Share And Evaluation 2010

The report I am going to share with you is developed by Panorama Consulting. I get a lot of interesting information from it and also some key vendor findings report surprising me. If you are in process of ERP vendor selection or just want to know which the best ERP is, you should read this report. I bet you will love it.   

I will not copy and paste the report in my blog  but only part of the report which I was interested with. I gonna show you ERP market share in 2009 and some key vendor findings. You can download the full report through a link at the bottom of this article.

Okay, let’s moves on to explore the report. I found some interesting key vendor findings: Top 10 short-listed and selected ERP vendor, most are at least fairly satisfied with their selected software vendor and overall realized benefit are low. Why am I interested to those key vendor findings? Well, it opens my eyes that

  • Popularity of ERP software does not guarantee to get high level of satisfaction
  • Realized benefits implementation are independent from selection satisfaction.

Wait, maybe you wonder how reliable the report is? Unfortunately I don’t know. Don’t you trust to Panorama Consulting that has a lot of experience in implementing various ERP software at various clients? ..…. I’m joking. That is not the cause that report is reliable. Okay, they said that this report is based on survey result from 1600 organizations that have selected or implemented ERP within the last four years. With a lot of organizations involved in the survey, and their ERP experience, I think the report is reliable and also valuable.

They group ERP vendors into 3 : Tier I, Tier II and Tier III as you can see in a table below:

Sample Vendors
Tier I Tier II Tier III
SAP
Oracle
Oracle eBusiness Suite
Oracle JD Edwards
Oracle Peoplesoft
Misrosoft Dynamics
Epicor
Sage
Infor
IFS
QAD
Lawson
CDC Software
ABAS
Activant Solutions Inc.
Bowen and Groves
Compiere
Exact
NetSuite
Visibility
CGS
Hansa World
Consona
Syspro
Small companies which usually have less than 30 users and less demanding needs prefer using Tier III software. Mid-size companies (with less than 100 users) that have outgrown Tier III packages often become Tier II clients. They usually have just a few localized sites and prefer short-term investments. Tier I software is targeted for large enterprise company.

Here is the ERP market share at 2009 between Tier II and top 3 Tier I vendors.

erp market share

According to the chart above, SAP is still top leader with 31% market share. However, in 2005-2006, based on AMR Research, SAP market share was 47%, Oracle 25% and Microsoft was only 3%. Microsoft’s market share increase from 3% to 15% while SAP’s market share decrease from 47% to 31%.

Key Vendor Findings

1.Top 10 short-listed and top selected ERP Vendor
As you guess, Tier I vendors were listed most frequently. SAP, Microsoft and Oracle are the top 3 of the list. How about the top selected ERP Vendor? The top result is still from Tier I: Oracle and SAP. The selection rate was based on the frequency of each vendor being selected over the frequency of each being considered in the selection phase. As I noted earlier that the top short-list or top selected does not guarantee the implementation success. You will be surprised how low realized benefit gets from Tier I implementation in next key vendor findings.

2. Most Are At Least Fairly Satisfied With Their Selected Software Vendors.
I was surprised with the chart below since more than 50% Tier I clients are neither satisfied nor very satisfied with their ERP. Unfortunately we don’t know satisfied level for each vendor of Tier I. But satisfaction level can be misleading. Satisfaction level for executives could be different from users. Some executives are just happy to complete project, protect the organization from risk and so on while users achieve high level satisfaction levels through advanced operational processes and robust functionality.Anyway, here is chart of satisfaction level in overall

what is erp, erp vendor, erp comparison, erp evaluation

And this is Satisfaction Level by Vendor Tier

3. Overall Realized Benefits Are Low
It’s also surprised me. As you see the chart below, nearly 70% of Tier I clients fail to realize at least 50% of business benefits. It’s a big number for me although the report said that it likely caused by over-estimated since around 15% of companies don’t have proper models to quantify how much more they could achieve. Did they select wrong ERP software? It could be. But the report said that realized benefits are independent from selection satisfaction. So, selection satisfaction is important but is not enough, best-in-class enterprise software initiatives also include effective organizational change management activities to ensure employees are comfortable, efficient, and productive with new system.


what is erp, erp vendor evaluation, erp comparison, realisation benefit all what is erp, erp vendor evaluation, erp comparison, realization benefit  per vendor

Actually, there is one key vendor findings I’m interested, that is : 51% of implementations are at risk of going over budget. But since I don’t want to make this article too long, you can read it by downloading the report at the link below.

[ad#ad-1]

ERP Market Share And Evaluation 2010 :

2 Responses to ERP Market Share And Evaluation 2010
  1. Ajay
    September 14, 2010 | 4:56 PM

    The PIE Chart shown in the first figure sums up to 101, i.e., more than 100%? {31+25+15+30=101}; Is there something wrong in my understanding or there is mis-type of some number? Please help to clarify. Thnks!

  2. jrliem
    September 14, 2010 | 10:16 PM

    Thanks for the correction. I got it from Panorama consulting report & I believe that it’s mis-type. I think Microsoft Dynamic should have 14%

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://whatiserp.net/erp-comparison/erp-vendor-evaluation-2010/trackback/
Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.